Wiki Li

но строителей то учеными назвать нельзя...

задания 2013 года, вариант 3, А19: Over the past few years, I have been involved in Stemnet, an organization dedicated to promoting these careers by getting people who work in jobs from biologists to builders to talk to schoolchildren about what they do. Слово they относится к: a) careers b)schoolchilsren c)experiments d)scientists

задания 2013 года, B14; They won just one silver and two bronze medals and a review was launched into their ______. (TRAIN) Перевести не могу: Они выиграли 1 серебряную и 2 бронзовых медалей и обзор(?)-итог(?) привел к энергичному началу? их тренировок? Может так? trainings?

конечно, в 3-ем вопросе у меня опечатка, мы ответили False - без сомнения, это так. А вот с 6-ым вопросом мы тоже сомневались, но почему то думали, что это телефонный разговор. Поэтому, КАК девочка собирается передать статью Дэвиду, неизвестно. Here we go - еще попробуй расслышь. И пойми, что имелось ввиду. И как можно англ сдать на 100 баллов? Язык гибкий, живой... Это не математика.

вот он, гвоздь "номера", текст про Пушкина. Сломай мозг, называется.: (http://opengia.ru/subjects/english-11/topics/2?page=3) The introduction to a new biography of Gannibal by the author Alexander Pushkin was not only Russia’s greatest poet, but he was also the great-grandson of an African slave. The slave, whose godfather was Peter the Great, claimed to have royal blood of his own. Certainly his Russian descendants believed that he was an African prince. His descendants have included members as well as close friends of the English royal family. So the legend goes on. Pushkin told the story of his black ancestor in “The Negro of Peter the Great”, but this biography tells a different version. The main difference is between fact and fiction. The Russian poet hoped to discover a biographical truth by sticking to the facts, only to discover that facts are slippery and not always true. His biography turned into a novel. Even then, it was left unfinished after six and a half chapters. The scrawled manuscript comes to an end with a line of dialogue – ‘Sit down, you scoundrel, let’s talk!’ — and a line of dots. Pushkin could be speaking to himself. In any case, it’s now time to stand up and carry on with the story. I have tried to join up the dots. This is a book, then, about a missing link between the storyteller and his subject, an African prince; between the various branches of a family and its roots; between Pushkin and Africa; Africa and Europe; Europe and Russia; black and white. It is the story of a remarkable life and it poses the question: how is such a life to be explained? My own explanation began in 2001, while I was living in Russia and working there as a journalist. The first draft was written during the war in Afghanistan, on the road to Kabul, but it describes my journey to the frontline of a different kind of war in Africa between the armies of Ethiopia and Eritrea. According to legend, Pushkin’s ancestor was born there, on the northern bank of the River Mareb, where I was arrested for taking photographs and compass readings, on suspicion of being a spy. Understandably my captors didn’t believe that I was only a journalist researching the life of Russia’s greatest writer. At the military camp, where I was held for a number of hours, the commandant looked me up and down when I asked, in my best posh English accent, ‘I say, my good man, can you tell me, basically, what is going on here?’ ‘Basically,’ he replied, with distaste, ‘you are in prison!’ The incident taught me something. Journalists, like biographers, are meant to respect facts, and by retracing Gannibal’s footsteps, I hoped to find a true story. Some of those journeys lie behind the book, and are used whenever it is helpful to show that the past often retains a physical presence for the biographer – in landscapes, buildings, portraits, and above all in the trace of handwriting on original letters or journals. But my own journeys are not the point of the book. It is Gannibal’s story. I am only following him. Descriptions of Africa and the slave trade result from my journeys, but this is not a book about a ‘stolen legacy’, nor certainly about the intellectual wars that have been part of black history in recent years. Biographers, like novelists, should tell stories. I have tried to do this. I should, however, point out from the outset that Gannibal was not the only black face to be seen in the centre of fashionable St Petersburg at that time. Negro slaves were a common sight in the grand salons of Millionaires’ Street and they appeared in a variety of roles, such as pets, pages, footmen, mascots, mistresses, favourites and adopted children. At the Winter Palace, so-called court Arabs, usually Ethiopians dressed in turbans and baggy trousers stood guard like stage extras in the marble wings. 1. The slave’s Russian descendants believe that the slave A) had Russian royal blood in him. was Peter the Great’s godfather. C) belonged to the royal family in his native land. D) was a close friend of the English royal family. 2. According to the narrator, the biography of Pushkin’s ancestor turned into a novel because Pushkin A) didn’t like the true biographical facts he had discovered. found it impossible to stick to the facts that were doubtful. C) could not do without describing fictional events. D) found the true facts of the slave’s biography uninspiring. 3. The narrator’s objective in writing the book was to A) write a new version of the novel “The Negro of Peter the Great”. continue the story from where it was left unfinished. C) interpret’s attitude to his ancestor. D) prove that Pushkin’s ancestor was an African prince. 4. The narrator says that his research for the book A) brought him to Russia to work as a journalist. made him go to the war in Afghanistan. C) led him to take part in the war in Africa. D) brought him to a river bank in Africa. 5. The lesson that the narrator learnt from his arrest was A) not to use a camera and compass at the frontline. to avoid speaking to people in his best posh English accent. C) not to distort information about real events. D) never to tell people about his research. 6. The narrator thinks that his journeys A) helped him find some visible traces of the past. made him to feel sympathy to a “stolen legacy”. C) deepened his understanding of the concept of intellectual wars. D) turned out to be the main contents of his book. 7. The narrator points out that at the time of Gannibal A) negro slaves played a variety of roles in the theatre. black slaves were like stage extras in royal processions. C) many Africans made a brilliant career at the court. D) Africans were not a novelty in the capital of Russia.

я думаю, ответ 4.

1232133 - такие ответы. Это легкое задания, вот что я не люблю, так это scuba diving и аудио про пилота - столько терминов!

вообщем, FALSE - это когда в тексте упомянуто, но не то, и мы может исправить утверждение на верное, основываясь на тексте. НО! Если бы было все так просто. Встречалась с заданиями, где, судя по ответам, это правило не работало. Вот такой вот экзамен. загадочный....

мы с учениками отвечали false

Читали текст про Пушкина? Позже напишу свои вопросы, но там туши свет... Разбирали вчера с ученицей.

Ослепляет? Отсвечивает?

Коллеги! на сайте ФГБУ, где выложены 9 вариантов 2013 года появились 12 Мая 2014 Варианты КИМ ЕГЭ 2014 года (Досрочный этап) В разделе ГИА\Варианты КИМ ЕГЭ 2014 г. представленны для ознакомления экзаменационные материалы ЕГЭ 2014 г. (Досрочный этап) по всем предметам. http://www.rustest.ru/ege/varianty-kim-ege-2014/ Но, думаю, вероятность того, что такие же будут на настоящем ЕГЭ, мала. Alas! но хоть что-то! =)

Вот именно дитё из старшей школы и задало мне этот вопрос. Сама бы я может и не заметила. А у них грамматика в голове, где WAS и NOW находятся далеко друг от друга. Объяснила так же, не сразу поняли. Привела пример "Сейчас я УЖЕ закончила 10 классов". Вроде дошло. Но к чему еще об это спотыкаться, когда и так одни сомнения в ответах (((( Я в унынии.

Писать только на уроках, по-моему, можно, так как дома дети просто печатают текст в переводчик Гугл, и списывают получившееся в соседней колонке. Особенно выдают себя, если написали по-русски с ошибкой, а гугл выдал: On Fridays I go to myzikalna school, I PALOZHIL book in my bag. К примеру.

)))))))) Нет, не видела никогда! Но я всего 2 года работаю. Дети когда сами сочиняют, так забавно получается. У меня малыши пишут, например, I must GET OUT my room. Или in spring the sun GLITTERS! Сегодня проверяла тетради 3 класса.

как за ученика можно писать? А он что тогда будет делать? сидеть смотреть? =)

И зачем же детей с первого предложения вводить в заблуждение? Ну "всё для людей", всё для того, чтобы сдали успешно.....

А я сколько раз уже вопросы задавала из этих тестов))))) И вот очередной вопрос: те 9 вариантов, о которых в начале темы сказано, Вариант №3: интересует 1ое предложение WAS и тут же NOW. Что детям то сказать?

о том, как перевести первичный балл в тестовый http://4ege.ru/novosti-ege/2585-shkala-perevoda-ballov-ege.html

Коллеги, как в эссе писать his или her - в таких случаях: Secondly, when person is talented, his\her work will never be boring. Also, if he\she has a boss he\she has the best projects. His\her inventions always will have success. Boss will be grateful for it to him\her. ведь явно не так!

Отлично!!! Какой прекрасный ресурс, я уже попробовала - скопировала туда сочинение про автомобили! Большое СПАСИБО!

Спасибо, richgoodman, за, как всегда, познавательный разбор содержания! Здесь УЧЭНИК хотел опровергнуть аргумент, что из-за автомобилей люди меньше двигаются. Получилось - "Что же касается недостатка движений,вызванного авто, то многие как-раз таки и используют КА, чтобы ездить на тренировки в спорт залы". понятно? http://vk.com/video149221589_161593737

Скажите, а как переводить первичный балл в итоговый?

А почему бы не дать возможность справиться-таки с заданием и сдать нормально экзамен? Если дети справляются с заданием - его надо убирать?

Выношу на ваш суд еще одно эссе: Lots of people believe that cars have improved their lives. However, some people think that our world would be better without cars. Cars have become a part and parcel of our life. Nowadays, everyone has his own car. We can’t imagine our life without cars. However, some people have another point of view and believe that our life will become better without them. Who is right? In my opinion, having an automobile is significant. Firstly, it is a quick way of transportation. Secondly, car is convenient for travelling, because you can stop at any time at any place, also, if you have children or heavy goods to carry, using a car can help you. Thirdly, there are people who go with the time so they express their individuality through their cars. Thus, a car is one of the most important things in our life. On the other hand, automobiles have a bad influence on environment causing air pollution. Moreover, they make traffic-jams. Besides, cars prevent from walking and may lead to problems with health. So, automobiles have disadvantages too. However, I cannot agree with this opinion completely because nowadays there are eco-cars, which are environment friendly. They do not influence atmosphere so much. Further, if government deals with improving roads, traffic-jams will disappear, too. As for the lack of moving, there are people who have automobiles and use them just to get to sport clubs. In conclusion, automobiles are among the most convenient means of transport, because they save our time and energy. (232 words)